Business-and-Corporations-Section-Newsletter-Banner
    DECEMBER 2016
     
    dark blue triangle in newsletter heading
    IN THIS ISSUE
     
    Ethics Webinar: Conflicts of Interest and Corporate Practice
    >
    Proxy Access Proposals
    >
    SEC Enforcement Actions Reach New High
    >
    SEC Modernizes Intrastate and Small Offerings
    >
    Enhance Your Practice
    >
    Law Firm Memos
    >
     
    The Business and Corporations Law Section eNews
    is published by the Business and Corporations Law Section

    Editors:
    Theresa Leets
    Department of Business Oversight
    Theresa.Leets@dbo.ca.gov


    Peter M. Menard


    Business and Corporations Executive Committee Officers:

    Barry Burten, Chair
    James Coupe, Vice Chair/Treasurer
    Candice Choh, Chair Marketing and Membership
    Theresa Leets,  Co-Chair Programming
    Peter M. Menard, Co-Chair Programming
    Katherine Blair,  Secretary

    Members:
    Kevin L. Finch
    Arash Khalili

    Corporate Law Departments Section Representative
    Lois M. Jacobs

    Barristers Liaison
    Jason R. Parnell

    Department of Business Oversight Liaison
    Theresa Leets

     



     
    triangle-heading-yellow-25h
    Ethics Webinar
     
    Conflicts of Interest and Corporate Practice

    Calendar now the first of the free 2017 “Hot Topics” webinar series to be held on January 12, 2017. Earn that hard to obtain ethics credit.

    Sometimes spotting a conflict of interest is easy. But many times it is not. The Rules of Professional Conduct can be complicated, confusing, even counterintuitive. This webinar will provide a framework for thinking about conflicts, examine real-world issues faced by corporate lawyers, and help you to take much of the guesswork out of complying with the rules.

    The program will start at 12:00 noon on Tuesday, January 12, 2017, and run for an hour with corresponding MCLE credit.

    Speaker: John Throckmorton, Arnold & Porter

     
    triangle-heading-yellow-25h
    Proxy Access Proposals
     

    In July 2016, the staff of the SEC declined a no-action request by H&R Block to exclude a shareholder proposal to amend selected terms of the company's existing proxy access bylaw. The company had sought to exclude the proposal in reliance upon Rule 14a-8(i)(10) on the grounds that proxy access had been "substantially implemented."

    Under a line of no-action letters, the SEC generally has permitted companies that have not yet adopted proxy access to exclude a shareholder proposal seeking proxy access on the grounds that it has been "substantially implemented" where the company adopts a proxy access bylaw with generally acceptable thresholds for the key provisions, even if the company's bylaws contained additional or differing terms for secondary provisions.

    In 2015, H&R Block adopted a proxy access bylaw in response to a shareholder proposal from James McRitchie. In 2016, Mr. McRitchie sought to change selected terms of the newly adopted proxy access bylaw, including: increasing the number of shareholders that could form a nominating group (unlimited versus a 20 shareholder limit in the existing bylaw); eliminating the limitation on renominating a person based on the number of votes received; counting loaned securities toward the threshold ownership percentage; and increasing the cap on board seats (the right to nominate the greater of two directors or 25% of the board versus up to 20% in the existing bylaw). In declining no-action relief, the SEC distinguished between a proposal seeking to implement proxy access and one seeking to change specific terms of an existing proxy access bylaw.

    For a discussion of this and subsequent no-action requests to exclude shareholder proposals to amend existing proxy access bylaws, see "Law Firm Memos" below.

     
    triangle-heading-yellow-25h
    SEC Enforcement Actions Reach New High in FY 2016
     

    The SEC has announced that it filed 868 enforcement actions in its fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, a new single year high.

    The agency also obtained judgments and orders in 2016 totaling more than $4 billion in disgorgement and penalties, which is relatively the same as for fiscal years 2014 and 2015. The 2016 enforcement actions included the most ever cases involving investment advisers or investment companies and also reached new highs for Foreign Corrupt Practices Act-related enforcement actions and money distributed to whistleblowers in a single year. "By every measure the enforcement program continues to be a resounding success holding executives, companies and market participants accountable for their illegal actions," said SEC Chair Mary Jo White.

     
    triangle-heading-yellow-25h
    SEC Adopts Final Rules to Facilitate Intrastate and Regional Securities Offerings
     

    The SEC has adopted final rules that modernize how companies raise money through intrastate and small offerings.

    The final rules amend existing Securities Act Rule 147 to modernize the safe harbor under Section 3(a)(11) of the Securities Act. The amendment allows issuers to continue to use state law exemptions that are conditioned upon compliance with both Section 3(a)(11) and Rule 147. The final rules also establish a new intrastate offering exemption, Securities Act Rule 147A. Rule 147A is substantially the same as existing Rule 147, but permits offers to be made to out-of-state residents and is available to companies that are incorporated or organized out-of-state if their principal business operations are located in that state.

    To facilitate capital formation through regional offerings, the final rules amend Rule 504 of Regulation D under the Securities Act to increase the aggregate amount of securities that may be offered and sold under that exemption in any 12 month period from $1 million to $5 million. The rules also apply the bad actor disqualifications to Rule 504 offerings to provide additional investor protection, consistent with other exemptions under Regulation D. In light of the increase in the size of the offering permitted by Rule 504, the final rules repeal Rule 505 of Regulation D.

     
    triangle-heading-yellow-25h
    Enhance Your Practice
     
    Enhance Your Practice: Join the Executive Committee of the Business and Corporations Section

    The Executive Committee of the Business and Corporations Section is seeking new members. Membership on the Executive Committee is a terrific forum to network with your fellow corporate law practitioners across the city. Membership on the committee affords unique opportunities to participate in the creation of law in your practice area, to get to know and be known by other practitioners, to work with the recognized leaders in your field, and to stay on the cutting edge of developments and practice techniques. For further information on the Section click here.

    If you are interested, please contact cchoh@gibsondunn.com.

     
    triangle-heading-yellow-25h
    Law Firm Memos
     

    The Supreme Court Reaffirms Dirks in Salman
    Dorsey & Whitney LLP

    In Salman v. United States, Supreme Court Holds that the Government Need Not Prove that an Insider Received a Pecuniary Benefit in Exchange for Tipping Inside Information
    King & Spalding

    Recent Developments in Proxy Access
    Dorsey & Whitney LLP

    Proxy Access Update—Momentum Continues to Build in 2016
    Sidley Austin LLP

    SEC Staff Permits Exclusion of Proxy Access "Revision" Proposal Due to "Substantial Implementation"
    Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

    SEC Proposes Universal Proxy Cards for Contested Director Elections
    Morrison & Foerster LLP

    SEC Adopts Final Rules Regarding Intrastate and Regional Offerings
    Morrison & Foerster LLP

    SEC Amends Securities Act Rules 147 and 504 to Facilitate Intrastate and Regional Securities Offerings
    O'Melveny & Myers LLP

    SEC Enhances Exemptions for Local Offerings
    Covington & Burling LLP

    ISS and Glass Lewis Update Their Proxy Voting Guidelines for 2017
    Morrison & Foerster LLP

    Planning for Your Annual Shareholder Meeting: Selected Considerations for a Virtual-Only Meeting
    Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

    Court Rejects Challenge To Internal Affairs Doctrine
    California Corporate & Securities Law Blog

    When Non-Voting Shares Have the Right To Vote
    California Corporate & Securities Law Blog

     

    Readers are advised that changes in the law may affect the accuracy of this publication or the functionality of links after the publication date.
    © 2016 LACBA. All rights reserved. LACBA.

    If you do not wish to receive this eNewsletter in the future, you can unsubscribe by the link at the bottom of this page.

    To obtain more information on how to contact LACBA, visit: www.lacba.org, or call (213) 896-6560. This is an educational newsletter message from LACBA.

    You may contact LACBA at the following address:

    LACBA
    1055 West 7th Street, Suite 2700
    Los Angeles, CA 90017
    LACBA_logo_200w
    www.lacba.org

    © 2016 Los Angeles County Bar Association Contact LACBA at msd@lacba.org


    You are subscribed to %%list.name%% as %%emailaddr%% . You are receiving this message because you are a member of the Los Angeles County Bar Association (LACBA) or one of its sections, have registered to receive correspondence through LACBA's website, or are a member of the legal profession. If you wish to be excluded from any future correspondence, please see instructions below or mail us at 1055 West 7th Street, Suite 2700, Los Angeles, CA 90017-2557. To unsubscribe from this mailing list, click the following url, %%url.unsub%% or copy and paste the following url into your browser %