|
What Every Lawyer Should Know about Record Preservation and Correction
What Every Lawyer Should Know about Record Preservation and Correction
By Tillman J. Breckenridge, associate, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, LLP. At GMSR, he focuses on civil appeals in both state and federal courts. The opinions expressed are his own.
It often is tempting at trial to take shortcuts in the interests of time and convenience. But do not take shortcuts at the cost of protecting the record because, on appeal, "if it's not in the record, it did not happen...." (Protect Our Water v.
Before taking any shortcuts, consider whether your actions will waive an issue on appeal or make the record unclear. At best, an unclear record causes confusion and a heap of work for you and your appellate counsel to correct the confusion. At worst, it can mean lost appellate issues. Keeping the following tips in mind should help guarantee that you have a clear and thorough appellate record.
1. Ensure that all evidence is properly identified and marked for the record regardless of whether it was admitted, and preserve it after trial.
Preservation of the exhibits after trial is equally important. To the extent that you and not the opposing party are in control of trial exhibits, store the exhibits in a safe place under conditions that will not damage any videotapes, physical evidence, or other material that may be sensitive. You also should discuss with opposing counsel what steps they are taking to ensure that the exhibits they possess are preserved.
2. Make proper objections and offers of proof, and get a clear ruling.
If the court is going to exclude your evidence, you may need to make an offer of proof. You should provide the exact testimony or evidence to be given rather than a summary or general representation. (Semsch v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hosp. (1985) 171 Cal.App.3d 162, 168.) Failure to record "the substance, purpose, and relevance" of the evidence offered generally waives a right to appeal or new trial based on the erroneous exclusion of the evidence. (Cal. Evid. Code Sec. 354(a).) Even though there are a few exceptions to this rule, it is better to take the time to make your offer of proof rather than to rely on the appellate court to uphold an exception.
3. Get it on paper, and make it readable.
If videotaped testimony is offered to the court, do not waive transcription of the testimony. While it may seem to make unnecessary work for the court reporter, it is essential that appellate counsel have an easily citable record with which to work. Few if any justices on the court of appeal enjoy watching videotaped testimony or fiddling with cumbersome exhibits just to determine whether testimony or evidence is accurately reflected in the briefs.
4. If you can't get it on paper, make sure it is in an easily accessible form.
5. If you know of an error in the record, try to correct it before the record is filed in the court of appeal. # # # |