Los Angeles County Bar Assocations
HOME MEMBERSHIP CALENDAR JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS SEARCHABLE CIVIL REGISTER KNOW YOUR JUDGES DAILY EBRIEFS LA LAWYER SECTIONS

    My Account
    My Practice
    Practice Tools
    Resources
    Practice Areas
    CLE on Demand
    Links
    Publications
    Sections
    Barristers
    List Services
    Career Resources
    Volunteer Opportunities
    Lawyer Referral
    Dispute Resolution Services
    For the Public
    Foundation
    Contact Us
    About Us


LACBA's blog.
LACBA on Twitter.
LACBA on Facebook.
LACBA on LinkedIn.

 

Court Navigator
Manage Your Subscriptions

Product Descriptions
Searchable Civil Register Info
Daily Case Filings
Daily Case Type
Daily Name Watch
Daily Case Watch

 


November Run-Offs: Judicial Ratings
The following candidates represent judicial offices to be decided in the November run-off election, followed by last spring’s ratings by LACBA’s Judicial Election Evaluations Committee:

Superior Court, Office No. 2
Joseph “Joe” Deering, rated “Well Qualified”
Hank Goldberg, rated “Well Qualified”

Superior Court, Office No. 39
Richard E. Naranjo, rated “Qualified”
Craig Allen Renetzky, rated “Qualified”

Superior Court, Office No. 67
Paul A. Bacigalupo, rated “Well Qualified”
David Gelfound, rated “Qualified”

Superior Court, Office No. 100
John C. Gutierrez, rated “Qualified”
Richard F. Walmark, rated “Well Qualified”


LACBA’s Judicial Election Evaluations Committee prepared evaluations last spring for 21 candidates seeking seven judicial offices in the March 5 election. Of those races, four resulted in run-off elections to be decided this November.

Candidates were evaluated as “Well Qualified,” “Qualified” or “Not Qualified.” The candidates were reviewed for professional ability, experience, competence, integrity and temperament. A “Well Qualified” evaluation is indicative of superior fitness to perform the judicial function with a high degree of skill and effectiveness. “Qualified” is indicative of fitness to perform the judicial function satisfactorily. “Not Qualified” indicates that the candidate lacks one or more of these qualities indicative of fitness to perform the judicial function satisfactorily.

The Judicial Election Evaluations Committee consists of 33 members appointed by LACBA’s president and represents a diverse cross-section of the legal community. The committee firmly emphasizes that it limits its evaluations to the candidates’ present qualifications for the particular judicial offices they seek at this time. The evaluations do not purport in any way to reflect upon any candidate’s qualifications for any other office or upon any candidate’s competence as a practicing attorney or in any other endeavor.






   Join LACBA
   Renew Your Membership
Click Here
   New Member?
Visit LACBA ORIENTATION
  

Member Savings Program
Free for LACBA Members - LexisNexis™ California Judicial Council Smart Forms
New Horizons
10 % Discount on Professional Development Courses
Premier Global Services
Communication Solutions for your practice
Corevault
Secure, off-site data backup
RPost
Accountability in electronic business communications
CLE+Plus
Your Pass to CLE Programs
   Law Students