|

A Compendium of Recent Cases
Cases appear in chronological order, with the oldest case appearing first.
-Trusts and Estates-
Trial court erred in concluding that a beneficiary's proposed challenge to an amendment to a trust would violate trust's no-contest clause absent trustors' unequivocal expression of intent that a beneficiary could challenge any future amendments to their estate plan, only upon pain of forfeiture. Trustee's failure to file an appeal from trial court's order granting safe harbor to beneficiary's petition, to extent that petition contested validity of trustee's exercise of power of appointment, precluded appellate review of that issue.
Townsend v. Townsend - filed February 23, 2009, Fourth District, Div. One
Cite as 2009 SOS D052325
Full Text Back to Top
|
Los Angeles County Bar Association
2008-09 Trusts and Estates Section Newsletter
|
TRUSTS & ESTATES SECTION REVIEW
Amy L. McEvoy, Co-Editor, David C. Nelson, Co-Editor, Nelson J. Handy, Co-Editor
|
SECTION OFFICERS
Chair
Laura G. Conti
Vice-Chair
Jonathan L. Rosenbloom
Treasurer
Nelson J. Handy
Secretary
Nelson J. Handy
Immediate Past-Chair
David C. Nelson
Section Administrator
Elise Green
|
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS
|
Michael A. Abraham
Susan J. Cooley
Tala R. Davis
Linda N. Deitch
Sibylle Grebe
Samuel D. Ingham III
Susan Jabkowski
|
Lawrence J. Kalfayan
Thomas H. Kenney
Jamie Lee Kim
Jane E. Kwon
Matthew W. Mc Murtrey
Amy L. McEvoy
Jacqueline Real-Salas
Leigh Shipp
Kira S. Vincze
Stuart D. Zimring
|
SUB-SECTION MEMBERS
Barristers Liaison, Laura Narimatsu Wasserman
Liaison Beverly Hills Bar Association, Trudi Sabel Schindler
Ex Officio, James R. Birnberg
Ex Officio, John M. Byrne
Ex Officio, Leslie A. Parrish
Ex Officio, Nancy B. Reimann
|
|
Readers are advised that changes in the law may affect the accuracy of this publication or the functionality of links after the publication date.
The foregoing practice tips were prepared for information purposes only. Such practice tips do not constitute tax, legal or other advice and no responsibility is assumed for any reliance upon them or with respect to assessing or advising the reader as to tax, legal, or other consequences arising from a particular situation. The accuracy of the information provided should be independently verified by the reader and should not be treated as authoritative.
|