Real-Property-Section-Newsletter-banner
VOLUME 12 | NUMBER 10 | OCTOBER 2017
 
dark blue triangle in newsletter heading
IN THIS ISSUE
 
Introductory Remarks
>
Coming Events
>
Save the Date!
>
CLE Anytime
>
Recent Cases
>
 

The Real Property Section Newsletter is published monthly by the Real Property Law Section.

Editor:
Teresa Y. Hillery
Vice President and Trial Counsel
Fidelity National Law Group
Teresa.Hillery@fnf.com

 

Real Property Executive Committee:

SECTION OFFICERS

Chair
Caroline Dreyfus

First Vice Chair
Claire Hervey-Collins

Second Vice Chair
Eric Altoon

Treasurer
Misty Sanford

Secretary
Nedra E. Austin

Immediate Past Chair
Susan J. Booth

Barristers Liaison
Christopher Bordenave

Section Administrator
Fatima Jones

 

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS

Janna Boelke
James Earle
George Fatheree
Daniel L. Goodkin
Owen P. Gross
Marybeth Heydt
Teresa Y. Hillery
Ben Howell
Laurence L. Hummer
Donna E. Kirkner
Trudi Lesser
Daniel K. Liffmann
Linda E. Spiegel
Kelsey M. Thayer
Loretta Thompson
Seth Weissman

 

EMERITUS MEMBERS

Michael Bayard
Elizabeth Spedding Calciano
Norm Chernin
Brant H. Dveirin
Peter Gelles
Byron Hayes
Gordon Hunt
Bryan Jackson
Michael Klein
Mark Lamken
Gregg Loubier
Victor Marmon
Jerold L. Miles
O'Malley Miller
Donald Nanney
Gytis Nefas
Sarah Spyksma
Theresa Tate
Timothy Truax
Richard Volpert
Ira Waldman,
Pamela Westhoff
Norma Williams

 
SUBSECTION CHAIRS

Commercial Development and Leasing
Marcia Gordon
Construction

L. Adam Winegard
Finance
Jane Hinton
General Real Property
Rachel Sanders
Land Use Planning & Environmental Law
Beth Hummer
Title Co-Chairs
Brendan B. Penney
Vanessa A. Widener

 

 

Introductory Remarks

Call for Nominations!!

We are accepting nominations for the prestigious LACBA Real Property Section Outstanding Young Lawyer Award. If you have an attorney in your firm or have worked with an attorney who is exceptional at the practice of law and giving back to the community, please send the following to Linda Spiegel at lespiegelesq@cs.com: nominee's name, position, year and reasons for the nomination. Nominations must be received on or before November 30, 2017. For the Outstanding Young Lawyer Award criteria, click here.


Real Property-Oct 2017 Presentation

Sam Newman, Danielle Katzir, Jesse Shapiro and Daniel Denny (pictured left to right) of Gibson Dunn put on an outstanding presentation on the bankruptcy rules behind today's real estate mortgage lending structures for the Finance Subsection on October 18. Stay tuned for more exciting programming from your Real Property Section.

Sincerely,
Teresa Y. Hillery
Editor, Real Property Section Newsletter
E-mail address: Teresa.Hillery@fnf.com


 
triangle-heading-yellow-25h
Coming Events
 

November 14

Non-Judicial Foreclosure Requirements
Please join us for a lively discussion on complying with federal and California state statutes/laws that protect borrowers/debtors in non-judicial foreclosures.

> Click here for more information


November 16

Happy Hour Book Talk
LACBA Real Property Outreach Committee cordially invites you to a happy hour book talk from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 16, 2017, with Leslie ("Les") Klinger.

> Click here for more information


January 23

Making Cents of Construction Costs and Damages
All roads in construction claims lead to damages. Whether you represent owners or contractors, dollars represent the end game.

> Click here for more information


February 27

Annual Construction Law Update and Flaig Award
All roads in construction claims lead to damages. Whether you represent owners or contractors, dollars represent the end game.

> Click here for more information

 
triangle-heading-yellow-25h
Save the Date!
 

December 6

Ethics in the Representation of Cannabis Clients
California, which led the way in medical marijuana issues, has recently joined a handful of states that permit recreational marijuana. Given that marijuana is still federally illegal, California attorneys are faced with a growing number of ethical questions about whether to represent cannabis-related clients and how to effectively do so while abiding by the California Rules of Professional Conduct. Join us for a panel discussion with a wide range of practitioners about these issues.
 

LACBA Real Property CLE Anytime

Even if you can't attend our Real Property Section events, you can earn CLE credit by viewing our streaming videos. Here are a few options. Click any link below.

A Practical Guide to the Subdivision Map Act
Annual Construction Law Update and Flaig Award
Arbitration Provisions in Leases and Purchase and Sale Agreements: Considerations and Insights

 
triangle-heading-yellow-25h
Recent Cases
 
- CEQA -

The state Department of Pesticide Regulation's pesticide registration program is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act chapters 3 and 4, as well as Resources Code Sec. 21167, but it otherwise remains subject to the broad policy goals and substantive requirements of CEQA. The department's public reports on the lack of significant adverse environmental impacts were so inadequate as to render public comment on the reports meaningless where the reports did not describe potential alternative courses of action, failed to identify an environmental baseline, and did not contain a cumulative impacts analysis.

Pesticide Action Network North America v. California Department of Pesticide Regulation (Valent USA Corp.) - filed Sept. 19, 2017, First District, Div. Three
Cite as 2017 S.O.S. 4693
Full text click here >

When a party seeks to establish the applicability of the unusual-circumstances exception to the California Environmental Quality Act, it must prove that the project presents unusual circumstances and that there is a reasonable possibility of a significant environmental effect due to those circumstances. A court then assesses the agency's determinations on these elements by applying a deferential standard in reviewing the first element and a non-deferential standard in reviewing the second. A court cannot affirm an agency's implied determination that the unusual-circumstances exception is inapplicable by simply concluding that the record contains substantial evidence that the project involves no unusual circumstances.

To affirm such an implied determination, the court must assume that the agency found that the project involved unusual circumstances and then conclude that the record contains no substantial evidence to support a finding that any unusual circumstances exist or a fair argument of a reasonable possibility that any purported unusual circumstances identified by the petitioner will have a significant effect on the environment. The possibility of foreseeable First Amendment activity does not establish the applicability of the unusual-circumstances exception because the activity might lead to an unsubstantiated and ill-defined indirect or secondary environmental effect.

Respect Life South San Francisco v. City of South San Francisco (Planned Parenthood Mar Monte) - filed Sept. 18, 2017, First District, Div. One
Cite as 2017 S.O.S. 4703
Full text click here >

 
- Cleanup Costs -

A military contractor should not have been assessed with 100% of the cost of cleaning a contaminated site. The government had required the use of chemicals known to be hazardous, the company maintained compliance with the prevailing environmental standards as they evolved over time, and the government repeatedly agreed to share in the company's environmental cleanup costs over the course of more than 20 years.

TDY Holdings, LLC v. United States - filed Oct. 4, 2017
Cite as 2017 S.O.S. 15-56483
Full text click here >

 
- Conditional Use Permit -

The expiration of a previous conditional use permit changes the permitted use of a property under the zoning code, but not the occupancy classification under the California Building Standards Code.

Harrington v. City of Davis - filed Oct. 20, 2017, Third District
Cite as 2017 S.O.S. 5145
Full text click here >

 
- CPTHSA Act -

A property owner who voluntary remediates hazardous condition on his property can seek indemnity for his response costs under the Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substances Account Act. The owner's voluntary participation in the Assembly Bill No. 2061 process does not preclude such recovery. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act's consumer product exception applies to consumers using consumer products, not commercial properties used by consumers.

Otay Land Company, LLC v. U.E. Limited - filed Sept. 26, 2017, Fourth District, Div. One
Cite as 2017 S.O.S. 4786
Full text click here >

 
- FIRREA -

Nevada Revised Statute Sec. 40.459(1)(c)--which limited the ability of a third party to profit by purchasing real estate debt at a discount and foreclosing at full price--is pre-empted by the federal Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as applied to transferees of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. A bank's oral promise to grant a debtor time to come up with a payment plan did not form a contract when there was no exchange of consideration. While estoppel can apply to a promise for which there was no consideration paid, estoppel is inapplicable when the allegedly injured party could not have reasonably believed that the bank would have given it infinite time to put its affairs in order. Nevada law allows the holder of a secured debt to institute a deficiency action for the lesser of the difference between the amount of the debt and the fair market value of the property at the time of sale, or the difference between the amount of the debt and the actual amount for which the property was sold. Parties to such an action are not entitled to a jury trial on the fair market value of the property at issue.

Branch Banking and Trust Company v. D.M.S.I., LLC - filed Sept. 11, 2017
Cite as 2017 S.O.S. 15-16933
Full text click here >

 
- Water Rights -

The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act does not prohibit the National Park Service from prohibiting the use of hovercraft on a stretch of the Nation River that runs through the Yukon-Charley National Preserve because the United States had an implied reservation of water rights, rendering the river public lands.

Sturgeon v. Frost - filed Sept. 2, 2017
Cite as 2017 S.O.S. 13-36165
Full text click here >

 
LACBA_logo_200w
www.lacba.org

© 2017 Los Angeles County Bar Association Contact LACBA at msd@lacba.org

 


You are subscribed to %%list.name%% as %%emailaddr%% .

You are receiving this message because you are a member of the Los Angeles County Bar Association (LACBA) or one of its sections, have registered to receive correspondence through LACBA's website, or are a member of the legal profession. If you wish to be excluded from any future correspondence, please see instructions below or mail us at 1055 West 7th Street, Suite 2700, Los Angeles, CA 90017-2557.

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, click the following url, %%url.unsub%% or copy and paste the following url into your browser %%url.unsub%%

                                                                                                                                                                         
LACBA twitter LACBA on Linkedin Real Property Section homepage Real Property Section Newsletters